<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for RES PUBLICAE</title>
	<link>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog</link>
	<description>The South Carolina Estates Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 05:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Definition - Administration by Christopher L. Miller</title>
		<link>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2009/07/07/definition-administration/#comment-15917</link>
		<author>Christopher L. Miller</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 06:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2009/07/07/definition-administration/#comment-15917</guid>
		<description>Hi Katie,

In responding, I assume you are contacting me from South Carolina and that the other heir is in the same degree of relationship as you are with the person whose estate you want to represent.

If the above is correct, each of the heirs are equally entitled to serve as personal representative.  Absent an agreement by the heirs as to who will serve, you will have to proceed by a formal proceeding, with notice to the other heir, and a hearing to be held in front of the probate judge to decide who will be most qualified to serve.

At this point, you should start thinking about having an attorney represent you. An attorney can explain the process to you and the other heirs, possibly clear up some misunderstandings or misconceptions, and work out an agreement on who will serve as personal representative.  There is also a procedure available where both heirs can serve as personal representative, which can reduce the paperwork required to wind up the estate.  

Absent an agreement by the heirs otherwise, the Probate Court may require a bond to be filed, which is another hurdle to deal with and will result in increased expenses. Furthermore, to obtain a bond requires a credit worthy and trust worthy individual, the bonding companies will check into personal backgrounds.        

Now the disclaimer.  I have done my best to generally answer your question.  But it is impossible to provide comprehensive legal advice over the internet.  The facts you have given me were limited, and I made several assumptions in trying to answer your question. I strongly advise you to consult with an attorney to help you. No attorney-client relationship arises from this communication.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Katie,</p>
<p>In responding, I assume you are contacting me from South Carolina and that the other heir is in the same degree of relationship as you are with the person whose estate you want to represent.</p>
<p>If the above is correct, each of the heirs are equally entitled to serve as personal representative.  Absent an agreement by the heirs as to who will serve, you will have to proceed by a formal proceeding, with notice to the other heir, and a hearing to be held in front of the probate judge to decide who will be most qualified to serve.</p>
<p>At this point, you should start thinking about having an attorney represent you. An attorney can explain the process to you and the other heirs, possibly clear up some misunderstandings or misconceptions, and work out an agreement on who will serve as personal representative.  There is also a procedure available where both heirs can serve as personal representative, which can reduce the paperwork required to wind up the estate.  </p>
<p>Absent an agreement by the heirs otherwise, the Probate Court may require a bond to be filed, which is another hurdle to deal with and will result in increased expenses. Furthermore, to obtain a bond requires a credit worthy and trust worthy individual, the bonding companies will check into personal backgrounds.        </p>
<p>Now the disclaimer.  I have done my best to generally answer your question.  But it is impossible to provide comprehensive legal advice over the internet.  The facts you have given me were limited, and I made several assumptions in trying to answer your question. I strongly advise you to consult with an attorney to help you. No attorney-client relationship arises from this communication.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Definition - Administration by Katie</title>
		<link>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2009/07/07/definition-administration/#comment-15916</link>
		<author>Katie</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 02:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2009/07/07/definition-administration/#comment-15916</guid>
		<description>How do you file a petition to be appointed personal representative.... the Probate Court said the other heir must sign to give their permission and they refuse?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you file a petition to be appointed personal representative&#8230;. the Probate Court said the other heir must sign to give their permission and they refuse?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Greenville Estate Lawyer: &#8220;Estate Tax Redux&#8221; by Christopher L. Miller</title>
		<link>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2010/06/06/greenville-estate-lawyer-estate-tax-redux/#comment-15883</link>
		<author>Christopher L. Miller</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 23:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2010/06/06/greenville-estate-lawyer-estate-tax-redux/#comment-15883</guid>
		<description>On the internet I have actually seen several websites advising people to change their domicile to South Carolina so that their estates will incur no state estate tax. As seen in the above post, this may or may not be effective in the year 2011 and beyond.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the internet I have actually seen several websites advising people to change their domicile to South Carolina so that their estates will incur no state estate tax. As seen in the above post, this may or may not be effective in the year 2011 and beyond.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Greenville Estate Lawyer: &#8220;Estate planning is a process, not an event.&#8221; by Christopher L. Miller</title>
		<link>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2010/04/03/greenville-estate-lawyer-estate-planning-is-a-process-not-an-event/#comment-15882</link>
		<author>Christopher L. Miller</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 23:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2010/04/03/greenville-estate-lawyer-estate-planning-is-a-process-not-an-event/#comment-15882</guid>
		<description>Planning with IRAs, pensions, and qualified plans and similar assets should only be undertaken with the professional advice of your attorney and a tax professional. These assets can be large, and the tax consequences of any mistakes can be disastrous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Planning with IRAs, pensions, and qualified plans and similar assets should only be undertaken with the professional advice of your attorney and a tax professional. These assets can be large, and the tax consequences of any mistakes can be disastrous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Definition - Per Stirpes by Christopher L. Miller</title>
		<link>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2009/07/20/per-stirpes/#comment-15521</link>
		<author>Christopher L. Miller</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 21:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2009/07/20/per-stirpes/#comment-15521</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, you can have a per stirpes distribution in a Will.  The language to do this is as follows: To A, B, and C, in shares per stirpes; or to my issue, in shares per stirpes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The current default distribution rule in New York is by representation. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;EPTL 2-1.2 provides that in any trust or Last Will executed after August 31, 1992 where property is left to "issue" without any qualifying language (per stirpes, per capita, or by representation), the default is by representation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;EPTL 2-1.2 also provides that any trust or Last Will executed prior to September 1, 1992, the default rules are per capita if the issue are in equal degree of consanguinity, or per stirpes if the issue are in unequal degree of consanguinity.  Thus, it is the date that the Last Will or trust was executed that determines what the default rule will be.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;EPTL 4-1.1 provides that after August 31, 1992 property passing under intestacy passes to issue by representation.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you can have a per stirpes distribution in a Will.  The language to do this is as follows: To A, B, and C, in shares per stirpes; or to my issue, in shares per stirpes.</p>
<p>The current default distribution rule in New York is by representation. </p>
<p>EPTL 2-1.2 provides that in any trust or Last Will executed after August 31, 1992 where property is left to &#8220;issue&#8221; without any qualifying language (per stirpes, per capita, or by representation), the default is by representation.</p>
<p>EPTL 2-1.2 also provides that any trust or Last Will executed prior to September 1, 1992, the default rules are per capita if the issue are in equal degree of consanguinity, or per stirpes if the issue are in unequal degree of consanguinity.  Thus, it is the date that the Last Will or trust was executed that determines what the default rule will be.</p>
<p>EPTL 4-1.1 provides that after August 31, 1992 property passing under intestacy passes to issue by representation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Definition - Per Stirpes by Allison Hoyt</title>
		<link>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2009/07/20/per-stirpes/#comment-15520</link>
		<author>Allison Hoyt</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 04:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2009/07/20/per-stirpes/#comment-15520</guid>
		<description>In New York, today, can you direct to have a per stirpes distribution of your property in your will?

In New York, today, if you say nothing about how you want your property distributed, is it by default by representation?

Thank you.

Allison</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In New York, today, can you direct to have a per stirpes distribution of your property in your will?</p>
<p>In New York, today, if you say nothing about how you want your property distributed, is it by default by representation?</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
<p>Allison</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Greenville Estate Lawyer: &#8220;Faulty Estate Plan Scenario Number One&#8221; by Christopher L. Miller</title>
		<link>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2009/12/07/faulty-estate-plan-scenario-number-1/#comment-15517</link>
		<author>Christopher L. Miller</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 01:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2009/12/07/faulty-estate-plan-scenario-number-1/#comment-15517</guid>
		<description>See my post on Revocable Trusts &lt;a href="http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2009/09/30/why-should-i-have-a-revocable-lifetime-trust/" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, where I discuss some of the uses of the revocable trust, their benefits, and yes, their drawbacks.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See my post on Revocable Trusts <a href="http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2009/09/30/why-should-i-have-a-revocable-lifetime-trust/" rel="nofollow">here</a>, where I discuss some of the uses of the revocable trust, their benefits, and yes, their drawbacks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Greenville Estate Lawyer: &#8220;House Votes on Estate Tax Extension&#8221; by Christopher L. Miller</title>
		<link>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2009/12/03/house-votes-on-estate-tax-extension/#comment-15514</link>
		<author>Christopher L. Miller</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2009/12/03/house-votes-on-estate-tax-extension/#comment-15514</guid>
		<description>On my way home from work last night I heard a talk radio host rail against the estate tax and make several arguments that I felt were quite dubious and misleading.  In the coming weeks, I am going to address some of the arguments against the estate tax, and show why many of them are red herrings.  In the meantime, check out my December 2, 2009 post on the estate tax  &lt;a href="http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2009/12/02/federal-estate-tax-changes-on-the-way" rel="nofollow"&gt;here.&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On my way home from work last night I heard a talk radio host rail against the estate tax and make several arguments that I felt were quite dubious and misleading.  In the coming weeks, I am going to address some of the arguments against the estate tax, and show why many of them are red herrings.  In the meantime, check out my December 2, 2009 post on the estate tax  <a href="http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2009/12/02/federal-estate-tax-changes-on-the-way" rel="nofollow">here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Definition - Inter vivos versus testamentary trusts by Christopher L. Miller</title>
		<link>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2009/11/10/whats-that-mean-inter-vivos-versus-testamentary-trusts/#comment-15512</link>
		<author>Christopher L. Miller</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 07:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2009/11/10/whats-that-mean-inter-vivos-versus-testamentary-trusts/#comment-15512</guid>
		<description>See another estate-related legal term defined &lt;a href="http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2009/07/20/per-stirpes/" rel="nofollow"&gt;here.&lt;a/&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See another estate-related legal term defined <a href="http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2009/07/20/per-stirpes/" rel="nofollow">here.<a /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Greenville Estate Attorney: &#8220;Honorary Trusts for the Care of Animals&#8221; by Michael</title>
		<link>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2009/10/15/honorary-trusts-for-the-care-of-animals/#comment-15509</link>
		<author>Michael</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://christophermillerlaw.com/blog/2009/10/15/honorary-trusts-for-the-care-of-animals/#comment-15509</guid>
		<description>Keep up the good work. I really like the In the News category. Funny that Leona gave her dog more than her grand children.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep up the good work. I really like the In the News category. Funny that Leona gave her dog more than her grand children.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
